Thank you to those who voted on last week’s poll. Only four people actually did so, but out of those I discovered that half were caregivers of someone who has dementia, with the other two being a professional and a student. Hopefully, more people will answer this week’s question. I’m hoping to discover what kind of articles you would prefer to see here on this site. It is possible to give multiple answers. Again, if you have anything to add in the “Other” category, please use the Comments function. This poll will run for one week.
Those of you who visit this site regularly will have noticed that one of my pet topics is concussions and brain injury in athletes (especially our youngsters). I’m glad to see that this subject is getting a lot of attention from others as well, including research into how we can prevent such things from happening. And the large number of professional football players who recently brought suit against the NFL only serves to illustrate how wide-spread the development of dementia in these and other athletes has become.
But, at least football players wear helmets that provide some degree of protection against concussions. (On second thought, after seeing the large number of former players mentioned in the recent lawsuit, I have to wonder just how much protection these helmets actually offer.) Participants in many other sports frequently place themselves at just as much risk of serious head injury, but typically wear no protection at all. The current attention given to soccer and the World Cup illustrates this very well.
In baseball, the batter does wear a modicum of protection on his head, and the catcher is dressed as if he was involved in a medieval jousting match. But the other players are left to their own resources. Now, of those in the in-field and outfield, it could easily be said that the player should be able to see the ball coming in time to get out of its way. But what of the pitcher? He will hurl a hard object at 90 mph or better at the batter, from 50 to 60 feet away, only to have the batter hit it with a force that sends it spinning at an even faster rate of speed — sometimes right at the head of the pitcher.
I’ve inserted some footage of a baseball pitcher being struck in the head by a batted ball, just to illustrate how dangerous this can be. A word of warning here — this might be hard to watch for some people, so if you choose not to view it I will understand completely. Even though this man walked out of the stadium on his own steam, I learned that he later had to have brain surgery, and has since suffered at least one seizure related to this incident.
Well, apparently our cries have been heard, and research has been on-going to develop a safe and practical helmet for baseball players — particularly for pitchers. Major League Baseball announced recently that it has plans on the table for six different helmets. Actually, the ones that I saw were nothing more than a regular baseball cap, with extra padding over the head. Most of the players interviewed stated that they would not wear such a helmet, if the choice was voluntary — even players who had been hit in the head. They viewed the danger of getting hit as an occupational hazard that they were willing to accept.
Some of us may have forgotten (or never knew) about the furor that accompanied the ruling that batters were to wear helmets, in 1971. And I’ve also heard about the problems involved in getting football players to wear helmets, many more years ago than that. I wonder, though, why a baseball player will gladly put on a helmet when he picks up a bat, and yet refuses to do so. Is it merely because his paycheck depends on it?
Dr. Gary Green, MLB’s medical director, has a few ideas as to why pitchers are reluctant to wear helmets. For one thing, players at bat are trained to keep t heir heads as still as possible, in order to hit the ball. This keeps the helmet from wobbling around. But the very gyrations that a picture goes through would make it difficult to throw with the accuracy, and at the velocity, to which they are accustomed. Not to mention what the addition of several pounds of weight would do to a player’s biomechanics.
Dr. Barry Jordan, director of brain injury rehab at Burke Rehabilitation Center in White Plains, N.Y., has an idea as to why the number of this type of injury has increased in recent years. He points out that today’s pitchers use a different style and posture when they throw, to add force and velocity to their pitches. So, whereas pitchers used to end their throwing cycle in a basic fielding position, ready to catch the ball if it was hit toward them, these modern pitchers are nowhere near in a position where they are ready to field a ball. And he quite logically argues that it would most likely be difficult to talk these pitchers into sacrificing a little speed and accuracy, for the sake of safety. Most of them would probably just as soon take their chances.
So, what’s it going to take to get MLB to produce helmets, and to entice players to wear them? Unfortunately, more than one source has said that someone’s going to have to die. I certainly hope that’s not the case. I think it would be incredibly tragic for the young people of our country to have to watch one of their heroes die on live TV. Gosh, I hope that doesn’t happen. But lately, something did happen that makes me think we may be on the verge of a turn-around in attitudes.
On June 22, Alex Torres of the San Diego Padres took his turn on the mound wearing one of the new helmets. I read that he had taken over the mound, last year, when another pitcher had been struck in the head by a batted ball. He also stated that he himself had a “close call” during spring training this year. He reasoned that the cap was free, and why not give it a try? I’ve seen a lot of comments from other players about how they wouldn’t consider wearing something like that — even players who have been the victim of line drives to the head. (Boggles my mind how the man who was involved in the clip presented above would refuse to wear something that might prevent him from further injury.) But others have said that it doesn’t look as bad as they thought it might. And, it is a first step. Who knows what might be developed down the road?
Here is a clip of Torres on the mound, wearing the helmet. There is some interesting conversation between the commentators about it, that is worth listening to.
Bravo, Alex. I hope you have a lot of people following in your footsteps.
Glen Campbell’s wife Kim announced Thursday that she has moved him into a long-term care facility. She stated that his Alzheimer’s Disease has progressed to the stage where he needs full-time professional care. Sadly, though, it seems that his children have made it clear that they are not totally in agreement with this decision.
I was impressed when I initially read about Mr. Campbell’s disclosure that he had AD, more so when I read about how his family and others worked so hard to enable him to continue to perform and record as long as he was able. Especially touching was the way his daughter, who also played in his back-up band, assisted him on stage during his last tour. (There used to be a clip of this elsewhere on my site. I’ll try to look it up and post the link here.) I have been fortunate enough to know other musicians who, if given the right kind of assistance, have been able to access procedural memory and perform long after some might not have thought it possible. To me, this just illustrates the idea that some memories remain, if we can only find a way to access them.
I do hope that the Campbell family resolves its disagreements and is able to work together to make their husband and father’s remaining days as fulfilled as possible. (And that they don’t follow in the footsteps of Casey Kasem’s family.) And I wish Mr. Campbell as peaceful an end to this life as is possible, and pray that he is welcomed into the arms of a loving God when the time comes.
I have started a Yahoo Group for the purpose of being able to discuss various topics related to dementia. Hopefully, this will encourage a little more participation from readers than with the Comments function here. Topics can related to things I post here, or questions or other matters raised by you — my readers. There is also a way for you to contact me privately, if you wish.
It is my impression that you do not need a Yahoo ID to participate. I know it used to be possible to join using your eMain address. (If this has changed, please let me know.) Membership is restricted, meaning that I will have to approve your request to join. This is to keep out spammers; Yahoo Groups used to be notorious about attracting spam. I will also be moderating members’ first few posts, until I get to know you. Of course, if you’re an active commenter here, I’ll approve your posts right away.
The new group can be found here.
I’m in the process of creating a Yahoo Group associated with this site. This will provide a place for people to pose questions, or suggest topics for discussion, with a little more flexibility than what is provided through the Comments section of this site. I believe there will also be a way to send a message directly to me, if desired.
Keep an eye out here, and I’ll post when the group is up and running. If anyone has suggestions for how they would like to see it set up, please leave a comment here and I’ll take it under consideration.
Okay, so I freely admit that I’m more than a bit behind the times. In these days when social media sites abound, I’m still standing on the sidelines with a somewhat perplexed look on my face. It’s true that I did meet my husband through an on-line discussion forum (long before the days of eHarmony), and I used to be active in the chat rooms, but that was fifteen years ago and the state of the art has progressed by leaps and bounds since then.
The other day, I ran across an old re-run of the TV show, “Law and Order,” in which a man was being tried for the brutal murder of his wife. One of the major underlying themes of the story was that the man had advanced dementia, and his daughter (and others) attempted to beg for leniency in his sentencing on those grounds. One of the show’s lawyers reported on her visit to the prison ward where persons with dementia were housed, and the substandard conditions they were subjected to.